REGULATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN RELIGIOUS COURTS
(Implementation of Justice, Finality and Legal Certainty Aspects)
Abstract
Religious courts have a function as actors of independent judicial power at the first level to administer justice to uphold law and justice. To carry out their functions, religious courts are given the duty and authority to examines, decide and resolve cases at the first instance between people of the Islamic faith, one of which is in the field of sharia economics. The urgency of this research is to explain and analyse the implementation of Radbruch's legal objectives in the trial process, so as to produce a fair and certain court decision. Therefore, this research aims to examine the regulation and significance of the settlement of sharia economic disputes in the Religious Courts. This research is a doctrinal research that examines the law conceptualised as a rule, using conceptual approaches and legislation. The results of the study found that: 1) the regulation of economic dispute resolution comes from legislation, customs, and jurisprudence; and 2) the significance of sharia economic dispute resolution in the Religious Courts, namely the obtaining of justice, finality / usefulness, and legal certainty for the justice-seeking community.
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, and M. Ali Safa’at. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.
Bachtiar. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Tangerang: Unpam Press, 2019.
Black, Henry Campbell. Black’s Law Dictionary. Amerika: West Publishing Co, 1968.
Burns, James H. “Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham’s Equation.” Utilitas 17, no. 1 (2005): 46–61.
Fachruddin, Andi. Journalism Today. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Fuadah, Aah Tsamrotul. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama Plus Prinsip Hukum Acara Islam Dalam Risalah Qadha Umar Bin Khattab. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
Hadrian, Endang, and Lukman Hakim. Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia: Permasalahan Eksekusi Dan Mediasi. Sleman: Deepublish, 2020.
Harjono, Dhaniswara K. Peranan Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi. Edited by Indri Jatmoko. Jakarta: UKI Press, 2021.
Irfani, Nurfaqih. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2020): 305–25.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988.
Mubarok, Jaih, Khotibul Umam, Destri Budi Nugraheni, Veri Antoni, Kesumawati Syafei, and Shandy Primandasetio. Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Departemen Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah - Bank Indonesia, 2021.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Mujahidin, Ahmad. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama Dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Di Indonesia. Jakarta: IKAHI Mahkamah Agung R.I., 2008.
Niervana, Anendya. “Regulasi: Pengertian, Bentuk, Dan Teori.” gramedia.com, n.d. https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/regulasi/.
Ningsih, Ayup Suran. “The Form of Justice in Resolving Capital Market Dispute Resolution.” In 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020), 221–29. Atlantis Press, 2021.
Nurhayati, Siti. “Penguatan Peran Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012.” YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (2016): 305–38.
Priadi, Eko, and Mhd Erwin Munthe. “Keabsahan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.” IQTISHADUNA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita 8, no. 1 (2019): 1–15.
Rudy, Dewa Gde, and I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari. “Kekuatan Mengikat Klausula Arbitrase Dalam Kontrak Bisnis Dari Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 11, no. 2 (2022): 427–37.
Schofield, Philip. “Jeremy Bentham, the Principle of Utility, and Legal Positivism.” Current Legal Problems 56, no. 1 (2003): 1.
Sudikno, Mertokusumo. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Lima. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.
Sulastri, Lusia, and Kurniawan Tri Wibowo. Merajut Sistem Keorganisasian Advokat Di Indonesia. Ponorogo: Gracias Logis Kreatif, 2021.
Tanya, Bernard L., Yoan N. Simanjuntak, and Markus Y. Hage. Teori Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.
Copyright (c) 2023 Heris Suhendar, Yadi Janwari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply the article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
