Jurisdictional Approach in REDD+ Implementation for Carbon Trading Management in Central Borneo
Abstract
Carbon trading is a promising mechanism to mitigate climate change. Indonesia, with its vast forest resources, has the potential to significantly contribute to global carbon reduction efforts. However, challenges such as deforestation and forest degradation persist, particularly in regions like Central Kalimantan. This study explores the potential of a jurisdictional approach to REDD+ in Central Kalimantan, which focuses on multi-level collaboration, local government involvement, performance-based incentives, and effective monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV). By empowering local communities and aligning with national and international policies, this approach aims to achieve sustainable forest management and carbon emission reduction. This research delves into the key steps involved in implementing a jurisdictional REDD+ approach, including planning, stakeholder engagement, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and scalability. It highlights the importance of addressing social and economic factors alongside environmental considerations to ensure the long-term success of REDD+ initiatives. By adopting a jurisdictional approach and addressing the complex interplay between environmental, social, and economic factors, Central Kalimantan can position itself as a leader in sustainable forest management and contribute significantly to global climate change mitigation efforts.
Downloads
References
Angelsen, A., Streck, C., Peskett, L., Brown, J., & Luttrell, C. (2008). What is the right scale for REDD. In Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications (Vol. 1, pp. 31-40).
Butt, M. (2010). The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. Complex predicates in cross-linguistic perspective, 48-78.
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
Dales, J. H. (1968). Land, water, and ownership. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique, 1(4), 791-804.
Ekawati, S., Budiningsih, K., Sari, G. K., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2019). Policies affecting the implementation of REDD+ in Indonesia (cases in Papua, Riau and Central Kalimantan). Forest policy and economics, 108, 101939.
Hermawan, S., Karim, M. F., & Rethel, L. (2023). Institutional layering in climate policy: Insights from REDD+ governance in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 154, 103037.
Husin, S. (2014). Climate Change Mitigation on Forestry Based on Reed+ in International Law and Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 26(3), 490-504.
Jodoin, S. (2017). Forest preservation in a changing climate: REDD+ and indigenous and community rights in Indonesia and Tanzania. Cambridge University Press.
Larson, A. M., Solis, D., Duchelle, A. E., Atmadja, S., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Dokken, T., & Komalasari, M. (2018). Gender lessons for climate initiatives: A comparative study of REDD+ impacts on subjective wellbeing. World Development, 108, 86-102.
Myers, R., Sanders, A. J., Larson, A. M., & Ravikumar, A. (2016). Analyzing multilevel governance in Indonesia: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of landuse change in Central and West Kalimantan (Vol. 202). CIFOR.
Newell, P., & Bumpus, A. (2012). The global political ecology of the clean development mechanism. Global Environmental Politics, 12(4), 49-67.
Santilli, M., Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S., Nepstad, D., Curran, L., & Nobre, C. (2005). Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change, 71, 267-276.
SARI, S. W. P. (2016). Perdagangan Karbon Menurut Hukum Internasional dan Implementasinya di Indonesia.
Simonet, G., Karsenty, A., de Perthuis, C., Newton, P. & Schaap, B. (2014) REDD+ Projects in 2014: An Overview Based on a New Database and Typology. Information and Debate Series No 32. Paris-Dauphine University, Paris, France
Skutsch, M., Bird, N., Trines, E., Dutschke, M., Frumhoff, P., De Jong, B. H., ... & Murdiyarso, D. (2007). Clearing the way for reducing emissions from tropical deforestation. environmental science & policy, 10(4), 322-334.
Suwarno, E., Kartodihardjo, H., Kolopaking, L. M., & Soedomo, S. (2015). The use of Ostrom’s concept on rules-in-use in the analysis of regulation of forest management unit formation. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(1), 13-26.
Thung, P. H. (2019). Decentralization of government and forestry in Indonesia (Vol. 249). CIFOR.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fitriana Selvia (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply the article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
